This article contains promotional links (affiliate). We may earn a commission if you book through them, at no extra cost to you.
Overall: ★★★★☆ 8.0/10 on Agoda (2,197 total reviews; 2,039 are Agoda-native, averaging 8.1)
Location: 9.0 | Staff: 8.5 | Value: 8.1 | Cleanliness: 8.0 | Facilities: 7.6 | Room comfort/quality: 7.0 (the two lowest categories)
Best for: Travelers prioritizing direct beach access and ocean views above a modern, recently-renovated facility.
Not ideal for: Travelers who want a recently renovated or modern-feeling property, or who are sensitive to signs of an aging building.
Typical price range: Mid-range, reflecting the beachfront location balanced against the property’s age.
Shimoda Prince Hotel has the clearest, most consistent trade-off of any property in our Kawazu guide: a 9.0 location subscore (direct Shirahama Beach access, ocean views) against a 7.0 room comfort/quality score — the lowest in this entire comparison. This isn’t a vague impression; it shows up as a specific, repeated theme across multiple lower-rated reviews.
This review pulls together the English-language quick facts and guest review trends we researched for our Kawazu Cherry Blossom hotel guide, and goes deeper on what to expect if you book this specific property.
Key hotel facts
Photo via Agoda
Photo via Agoda
- 8.0/10 on Agoda (2,197 total reviews; 2,039 Agoda-native)
- Direct access to Shirahama Beach
- Ocean-view onsen and ocean-view rooms
- Facilities (7.6) and room comfort/quality (7.0) are the lowest subscores — recurring “dated property” complaints in reviews
- Breakfast buffet praised; in-house dinner and vending machines described as pricey by some guests
Location and access
The hotel’s strongest asset is direct access to Shirahama Beach, one of Izu’s best-known beaches, plus genuine ocean-view rooms and an ocean-view onsen. If beach access and sea views are central to your trip, this location subscore (9.0, the highest in this guide) reflects a real advantage.
This makes the hotel a reasonable option for travelers extending their Kawazu cherry-blossom trip toward the coast for a beach-focused day or two, rather than staying purely centered on the sakura path itself.
Room, bath, and what it’s actually like
The honest trade-off: facilities (7.6) and room comfort/quality (7.0) are both the lowest subscores anywhere in our Kawazu comparison. Sorting reviews by lowest-rated first surfaces a clear, repeated pattern: guests describe the property as "とにかく古い" (simply old) — aging fixtures, an old toilet, occasional smells, bugs present in some reports, and cleaning described as mediocre rather than poor.
This is a real, recurring pattern across multiple low-score reviews, not an isolated complaint — if a modern, recently renovated feel matters to you, this is the property in our guide least likely to deliver that. One review also flagged a bump hazard at a tatami-edge corner in the room layout, and in-house dinner plus vending machine prices were called pricey by at least one guest.
English support and booking platform availability
Specific English-support details were not confirmed during research beyond the solid staff score (8.5). It’s bookable directly on Agoda with a large, well-established review base (2,039 Agoda-native reviews) to reference.
Breakfast, dinner, and dietary options
The breakfast buffet is consistently praised in guest reviews, a clear bright spot alongside the beach access and ocean views. In-house dinner and vending machine prices were called pricey by at least one reviewer — if budget matters, consider eating dinner off-property.
Luggage and practical notes
- No specific luggage-storage policy was confirmed beyond standard check-in/check-out.
- Given the aging-property complaints, ask about recent room renovations if a modern feel matters to you — not all rooms may be in the same condition.
What previous guests say (the real reviews, not the marketing copy)
The quotes below are a summary of review trends from Agoda guest reviews and may not reflect the current situation.
"The ocean view from our room and the beach access were incredible — exactly what we wanted for this part of our trip." / "The room felt quite old and worn — the toilet in particular, and we noticed a bit of a smell. Cleaning was just okay, not great."
- Multiple lower-rated reviews describe the property as noticeably aging — an old toilet, occasional smells, bugs in some reports, and mediocre (not poor, but not great) cleaning.
- If a modern, recently renovated feel is important to you, weigh this honestly against the genuine beach-access and ocean-view advantages before booking — and consider asking about recently renovated rooms specifically.
What booking sites may not make obvious
- Facilities (7.6) and room comfort/quality (7.0) are the two lowest subscores anywhere in our Kawazu comparison, directly tied to a repeated “aging property” theme in guest reviews.
- In-house dinner and vending machine prices were called pricey by at least one guest — budget for eating off-property if cost is a concern.
- One review flagged a bump hazard at a tatami-edge corner in the room layout — a minor but concrete practical note.
Who should avoid this hotel
- Travelers who want a recently renovated, modern-feeling hotel.
- Anyone sensitive to signs of an aging building (fixtures, smells) even when cleanliness is still described as adequate.
Better alternatives nearby
If Shimoda Prince Hotel isn’t quite the right fit, other hotels in our comparison guide cover different priorities:
- Shimoda Tokyu Hotel — also ocean-facing with onsen baths, and a notably higher room comfort experience, though with its own AC/temperature caveat.
- Gyokuhokan — much closer to the sakura path itself, for travelers prioritizing the cherry blossoms over beach access.
- Liberty Resort Amagiso — an in-room source-fed hot-spring bath, for a different kind of bathing experience.
See the full side-by-side comparison in our Kawazu Cherry Blossom hotel guide.
Where to book
Frequently asked questions
- Is Shimoda Prince Hotel modern or recently renovated?
Not especially — this is the one honest weak point in an otherwise solid property. Multiple lower-rated reviews describe the building as noticeably aging, with a repeated theme around old fixtures and mediocre (not poor) cleaning.
- Is the beach access really direct?
Yes — this hotel has the highest location subscore (9.0) in our Kawazu comparison, with direct access to Shirahama Beach and genuine ocean-view rooms and onsen.
- Is dinner included or should I eat elsewhere?
The breakfast buffet is well-reviewed, but in-house dinner and vending machine prices were called pricey by at least one guest — consider eating off-property for dinner if budget is a concern.
- Should I book a specific room type to avoid the aging-property issues?
This wasn’t confirmed in our research, but asking the hotel about recently renovated rooms specifically is a reasonable step if a modern feel matters to you.
- Are the rates and details in this review still accurate?
Rates and room conditions can change, including partial renovations over time. Confirm current details with the hotel or your booking platform before reserving.